On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 06:10:13PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think tt may be easy to provide the forked package with utf-8 support
> > for testing. Is this still OK ?
>
> Absolutely.
>
> > maybe newt-uff8 and slang1-utf8 or newt-i18n and slang1-i18n.
>
> I think I like the *-utf8 names better.
>
> > They would have conflict with the normal version. And if they are
> > OK, then the normal package can merge the utf-8 support safely, and
> > we won't need the separate pacakages then.
>
> Sounds good.
Who's going to work on newt-utf8? As I'm going to work on newt this week,
to build a -pic version, and fix a few serious bugs, I may as well
integrate the utf8 patch, and use a "#define" to build both the
"simple" and the -utf8 version from the same sources.
I'm assuming we are talking about the patch included in Bug#91963.
--
Enrique Zanardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
