from 2.2.18pre21 with cramfs patch (links are still broken):
timr@localhost:/lib/modules/2.2.18pre21/fs$ ls -l
total 524
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27057 Jan 23 22:42 cramfs.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 41336 Jan 23 22:42 fat.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 32516 Jan 23 22:42 minix.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 94164 Jan 23 22:42 nfs.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5280 Jan 23 22:42 nls_cp437.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3568 Jan 23 22:42 nls_iso8859-1.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6877 Jan 23 22:42 romfs.o
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14874 Jan 23 22:42 vfat.o
remember that vfat needs fat.
Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> By the looks of it romfs is the clear winner for space savings.
>
> 180483 initrd.cram.gz
> 161209 initrd.iso.gz
> 161023 initrd.ext2.gz
> 160621 initrd.minix.gz
> 159622 initrd.rom.gz
>
> romfs adds about 4kB to the kernel when built in
> cramfs adds ?
>
> the initrd filesystem will have to be builtin, which will be smaller
> than module size, so these are only usefull for relative comparison to
> other modules.
> 44599 ext2.o
> 30358 minix.o
> 24729 isofs.o
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/ - short SIGs! <g>
All I need to know I could have learned in Kindergarten
... if I'd just been paying attention.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
