> I'm curious... why was `ncurses' chosen over Slang for this? I > thought that the reason Slang had been used for the boot-floppies > `dinstall' was that it's a smaller library than `ncurses'. Or, does > it turn out that an `ncurses' subset is smaller or is just easier to > program and more flexible... or what? This has been discussed. slang will work just as well, but if we stay with the curses subset supported by slang than we can go with either ncurses or slang. randolph -- Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.TauSq.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- biweekly debian-installer status report Joey Hess
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Eray Ozkural (exa)
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Randolph Chung
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Karl M. Hegbloom
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status repor... Junichi Uekawa
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status repor... Randolph Chung
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status r... Eray Ozkural (exa)
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report ferret
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Karl M. Hegbloom
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Randolph Chung
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Gergely Risko
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Glenn McGrath
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Ethan Benson
- Re: biweekly debian-installer status report Joey Hess