On Wed Dec 13, 2000 at 02:05:45PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> >  [   ]  busybox_0.48-1_i386.deb        13-Dec-2000 13:46   238k
> >  [   ]  busybox_0.48-1_i386.udeb       13-Dec-2000 13:46    65k
> > 
> > You can't have a .udeb with the same name as a .deb; this is enforced
> > by katie (i.e. the package will be REJECTed) at JoeyH's specific
> > request. 
> 
> BTW my reasoning behind that is it could get confusing if someone
> manages to install a udeb onto a full debian system, and then runs into
> bugs and we don't realize they are due to the udeb, etc.

Any prefered naming scheme in use then?  
busybox-udeb.*.udeb?

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen   email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to