Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now that I have a first pass at the woody debian-installer busybox
> package out there, I now need to make another package to satisfy the
> woody boot-floppies.
Well, there might be other uses for a proper .deb of the package,
i.e., embedded systems and such.
> Of course, unless something is broken, the boot-floppies could
> continue using the version of busybox already included in the
> boot-floppies source tree, since that version has been fairly well
> tested and using that is certainly the path of least effort.
I don't want to do this because:
(a) it doesn't work with kernel 2.4
(b) you can't support it since it's not what you are using
(c) there are many bugfixes in the new one
> But you are the boss here Adam. Still want a busybox-bf package?
Well, wait a minnit, it's just a proper .deb of busybox with that
install.sh symlink-making script is all I wanted. Is it really a
busybox-bf package? Why -bf ?
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
