>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Holgate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nick> I have just spent couple of hours tracking down a problem with a minor patch
Nick> I made to the boot-floppies sources. It turns out that I made the assumption
Nick> that the macro FALSE would be defined as 0, when in fact dbootstrap.h
Nick> defines it as ((int) 1) and the corresponding TRUE definition as ((int) 0).
Nick> I have not checked, but could other boot-floppies hackers have also made the
Nick> same invalid assumption.
I think this was done deliberately. It's using shell semantics, not
C semantics for TRUE and FALSE.
TRUE is 0 + No error has occured.
FALSE is != 0 + the number indicates an error code.
Otherwise, perhaps there has to be an error code global variable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
