Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: > I would suggest zsh. It is much smaller than bash but has 99% of the features. > It is has also readline editing, completion, history, etc. for interactive use. > In my opinion ash lacks many useful features, for example variable expansion. > My debian installer was written in zsh and I found it very good. I'm a big zsh fan, but it's way too big: -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 351k Sep 11 00:42 /usr/bin/zsh* Anyway, we don't need any of its special features in the installer. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Adam Di Carlo
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Erik Andersen
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Michael S. Fischer
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Massimo Dal Zotto
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Herbert Xu
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Erik Andersen
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Michael S. Fischer
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Bernhard R. Link
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Adam Di Carlo
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Martin Keegan
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Joey Hess
- Re: redesigning the debian installer Martin Keegan

