> > Which UI: Text, fb, X11 or all selectable ?
>
> Whatever UI is being used. (Not sure I understand the question.)
It should be only a remark ... my intention was to think about the pain
for different setups. The current layout is 'text' based (select mono/color,
keyboard, ...). But for X11 ??? It is more like the corel-installer.
> was not properly set up, and it won't boot. And then try to remember
> where that rescue floppy/install media were filed a month ago..
Is was, it is and it will be always a size-boot-floppies problem :(
> This design is geared from the beginning to support mass installs.
> That's a big part of the reason it uses a debconf clone, so you can
> install once and get an install script for future installs.
Great. Have you or s/o the time to generate an layout-pic (xfig ?)?
It is easier to see the modules, talk about it and it is useful for the
documentation.
Thanks,
Hartmut
--
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Hartmut Koptein | Debian Maintainer and Porter
Tel.: 0178-koptein (0178-5678346) | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Non-Commercial Emails: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
