On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 04:24:15AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I still don't understand what you need this info for, it is easier and more
> > generic to simply check for a /dev/sda without /dev/sda# partitions below it,
> > and then see if there is a filesystem on it.
>
> Uh, I don't think such a check is actually all taht feasible, but I'm
> not really a major hacker here.
What is the problem here ? We already do all the stuff to find the partitions
by parsing /proc/partitions and looking at the /dev/sda#.
All the work is there, i think, we just need to precede the code for it by a
check for /dev/sda without /dev/sda# below it.
When i find some time for it, i will try to get a look. Hope i find the
relevant code part ...
> > Should i fill a bug against my superfloppy formatted old 520MB harddisk not
> > being recognized correctly also then ?
>
> Sure, or just followup on this one.
Will do ...
Friendly,
Svne LUTHER
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
