On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 10:24:53AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Sat Jul 01, 2000 at 11:27:31AM -0400, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > This package violates policy in several ways:
> > - first of all, the busybox binary package does not include
> > a copyright file, a changelog file or - indeed - a
> > /usr/[share/]doc/ directory!
> >
> > - second of all,
> > E: busybox: symlink-should-be-relative bin/head /bin/busybox
> > [...]
> >
> > - third of all, I am not sure if it is a good idea to
> > include a package in the distribution that cannot be
> > installed into a system without breaking that system
> > (this package conflicts with many essential packages)
> > You should definitely bring this issue up on -devel or
> > -policy before reuploading (btw, I cannot find an ITP
> > for this package...)
I don't think he undertstands that this "package" was previously an
integral part of the boot-floppies package and has since been split out
for easier maintainence. He needs to revert that decision.
Erik, it might have been a good idea to include this info in the package
upload so there was no misunderstanding :)
Ben
--
-----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
