Quoting Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 02:23:55PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > Quoting Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > I am pretty close to making the BusyBox 0.44 release at the moment.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What about boot-floppies?
> >
> > Depends on the consensus of the boot floppies developers.
> >
> > If folks want my latest and greatest in the boot floppies, then
> > I will be glad to merge it in. I think the easiest solution
> > for the future (and very possibly the present) is for me to
> > create a busybox.deb that conflicts with just about everything,
> > and that can be unpacked into the boot floppies the same way
> > the ash.deb is unpacked.
>
> That would be ideal for woody. For now, are there any known issues with
> the current busybox in boot-floppies that need to be resolved now?
This is really two questions:
What are the know bugs in the boot floppies version of BusyBox
that are fixed in the latest and greatest?
A fairly long list, as the boot-floppies version of BusyBox split
from my development tree about 1/2 way through the 0.43 release.
The current changelog may be helpful in answering this question.
ftp://ftp.lineo.com/pub/busybox/busybox-0.44pre3-Changelog
What bugs in the current boot-floppies BusyBox need to be fixed?
Probably just the tar bug. Other things, such as Bug #64576
are not really critical.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
