Hi Vincent, I have no clue about why these rejects happened and consider them unexpected as well. I'd appreciate a dak expert to comment here.
Would you mind uploading the package somewhere else so that there is some sample input data for use by a debug install of dak available? Cheers, Micha Am 29. November 2024 02:00:32 MEZ schrieb Vincent Cheng <[email protected]>: >On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:49 PM Debian FTP Masters ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed. >> >> Mapping bookworm-backports to stable-backports. >> binary:wesnoth is NEW. >> binary:wesnoth-core is NEW. >> binary:wesnoth-music is NEW. >> >> === >> >> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >> concerns. >> > >Looping in debian-backports this time. > >I tried uploading wesnoth-1.18 to backports a week ago [1] but it was >rejected for the same reason as now. I still do not understand why >wesnoth-1.18 is landing in backports-NEW; this upload does not >introduce any new binary packages and it was previously uploaded >successfully to bookwork-backports as a source-only upload [2][3]. Can >someone on either the ftpmaster or backports team chime in? Thanks! > >Regards, >Vincent > >[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2024/11/msg00004.html >[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2024/07/msg00016.html >[3] https://packages.debian.org/source/bookworm-backports/wesnoth-1.18 >
