On 2024-08-01 10:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Most of the current users are probably fine with armel > being moved from a release architecture to ports, but from > a user perspective I also think it would be nice to do > that after Trixie is out, so that there is at least one > official release with time64 library support.
Good point! Also, for armel to stay alive longer, we might like to remove some huge applications from its small shoulders. (I believe, e.g. libreoffice is still available for armel and I wonder, how useful that is.)
