On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 05:55:59PM +0100, Emanuele Rocca wrote: > On 2024-03-12 11:03, Simon McVittie wrote: > > In the medium term, cargo needs re-bootstrapping on the affected > > architectures (armel and armhf, plus a bunch of -ports architectures > > where as far as I can see cargo was never available in the past) - > > that's #1065787, and Steve already replied to that bug describing how > > Ubuntu did this.
> I don't think Ubuntu actually fixed cargo yet, at least if the data in > UDD is reliable -- and if I'm looking in the right place. :-) > udd=> select source,version,date from ubuntu_upload_history where > source='cargo' order by date desc limit 2; > source | version | date > --------+--------------------------------------------+------------------------ > cargo | 0.67.1+ds0ubuntu0.libgit2-0ubuntu0.20.04.2 | 2023-07-05 09:36:28+00 > cargo | 0.67.1+ds0ubuntu0.libgit2-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 | 2023-07-05 09:36:27+00 > (2 rows) cargo in Ubuntu is built from the rustc source package. > Maybe when Steve mentioned the work done in Ubuntu on > https://bugs.debian.org/1065787#22 he meant other packages? > > > Is there a porter who can take responsibility for that? > > I did manage to get cargo to build in a armhf chroot by manually > installing the various deps, see the build artifacts at > https://people.debian.org/~ema/cargo/. I can work on armel next. The > tests are green but maybe there's some more meaningful validation we can > do before uploading? Anyone from debian-rust has ideas or comments? > -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
