Hi! On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 10:45:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > it looks like enabling this flag on armel/armhf is a little bit premature. > > Apparently it's not completely supported upstream, and might cause > regressions, according to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1522678
I note that this bug was closed on 2018-01, so the information therein might not be the most up-to-date? > Is that a feature that the Debian ARM32 porters and the security team really > want to support actively, despite the missing upstream support? According to https://bugs.debian.org/918914#73 there were no pending toolchain issues related to this. And I think the security team mostly deferred to the ports teams. > In Ubuntu, people tracked down segfaults due to this change in at least > valgrind and gnutls, maybe more. If there's some missing support somewhere that might make this a common thing instead of just affecting a handful of packages that could simply disable the flags, and the Arm porters consider that fixing that is not feasible in the short term, I guess it makes sense to stop emitting the flag for the arm32 arches. In the end I'd still defer to what the porters prefer, and I can easily revert that change for arm32 and queue it for a next upload if desired. Thanks, Guillem