Control: severity -1 serious Control: tags -1 + ftbfs Hi Maintainer and i386, arm, mips porters
> As far as I can tell, the reason is that coreutils now uses a 64-bit > time_t and functions with a "64" suffix. Datefudge however does not > expose nor implement such functions. As can be seen on reproducible builds [1], datefudge now FTBFS on at least i386 and armhf, and I was able to confirm the failure on the mipsel porterbox. As datefudge is a build-dependency of gnutls28 and oath-toolkit, both key packages, how should this be resolved? Regards Graham [1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/datefudge.html
