On 2021-09-23, LinAdmin wrote: > On 10.09.21 21:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> On 2021-09-10, LinAdmin wrote: >>> The unnamed decision makers of Debian some unknown time ago >>> decided that Pi and *Pine* stuff won't be supported by Debian.
>> This is the second time you've stated this, without really adding >> meaningful content to the conversation, and people have presented >> evidence to the contrary... ... >> Somewhat of an aside, I feel inclined at this point to bring up the >> Debian Community Guidelines: >> >> https://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ >> >> I find it has some valuable thoughts that help improve my contributions >> to Debian. ... > So after my posting of 09-20-21 you kept silence ;) I didn't see anything I could meaningfully add about that particular bug report... https://bugs.debian.org/981586 > Still wondering why precisely you brought up Debian > Community Guidelines? The near-verbatim repetition of an inaccurate claim seemed worth mentioning; many people *have* in fact worked on improving support for the rpi and pine64 and other arm* systems in Debian. What specifically came to mind was: Improving the content * Ensure you are adding useful information https://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02s02.html There were also a few other threads in that discussion going on that I hoped could go a lot better if people would take a little time to review the Debian Community Guidelines and work it into the discussions on debian-arm. > And btw, not only me feels that "Unfortunately, the Linux desktop >community is very toxic. Wars between fans of desktop environments >(DEs), distributions, package managers, package formats, etc., threats, >personal attacks, etc. are very common in public chat rooms and >forums." It is an unfortunate state of affairs, indeed. Let's try to make sure debian-arm strives for the best signal-to-noise ratios rather than the worst. :) live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
