On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 11:12 AM Simon McVittie wrote: > What hardware is arm-conova-03 running on? Is it the same as amdahl, which > has a similar description on db.debian.org?
Both are running on the ganeti cluster at Conova, made up of conova-node01 and conova-node02. Looks like amdahl is currently running on the other node than arm-conova-03 but arm-conova-02 currently runs on the same node as arm-conova-03. I'm not sure what hardware the nodes are but they appear to be identical. pabs@conova-node01:~$ sudo gnt-instance list Instance Hypervisor OS Primary_node Status Memory amdahl.debian.org kvm noop conova-node01.debian.org running 12.0G arm-conova-01.debian.org kvm noop conova-node01.debian.org running 12.0G arm-conova-02.debian.org kvm noop conova-node02.debian.org running 12.0G arm-conova-03.debian.org kvm noop conova-node02.debian.org running 12.0G > Is there anything odd about how arm-conova-03's filesystem or /tmp works, > perhaps using tmpfs or NFS where other buildds don't, or not using tmpfs > where other buildds do, or an unusual level of load? There is no tmpfs mounted on /tmp, that is part of the ext4 from / > Or is there anything odd about arm-conova-03's TCP or other networking > setup? arm-conova-03 does not have an IPv4 address/route except on the loopback device but amdahl, arm-conova-01 and arm-conova-02 do. I would bet on the test not working on IPv6-only systems. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
