On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 06:42:19PM -1000, Julien Cristau wrote:
>On 12/09/2016 05:22 PM, Wookey wrote:
>> We can do poor-mans partial arch by just being fairly agressive about
>> disabling armel for packages that are broken or not suitable. Not very
>> clever or efficient, but it is easy to do and requires no infra or
>> tooling changes at all. So long as someone is volunteering for that
>> (easy but unexciting) work that could work.
>>
>We wouldn't necessarily want to call the result a Debian release, though.
Nod. Also (AIUI) fairly likely to break release work for testing
migration etc. unless people are very careful...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com
< Aardvark> I dislike C++ to start with. C++11 just seems to be
handing rope-creating factories for users to hang multiple
instances of themselves.
