On 17 August 2016 at 17:06, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> wrote: > And start agitating against pointer tagging in general.
Why would you want to do that when the architecture has specific support for it? thanks -- PMM
- arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the world... Leif Lindholm
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the wor... Koen Kooi
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the... Jeremy Linton
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of... Alexander Graf
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the... Alexander Graf
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the wor... Mark Rutland
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the... Leif Lindholm
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of... Mark Rutland
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the en... Leif Lindholm
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, t... Peter Maydell
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bit... Leif Lindholm
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, t... peter green
- Re: arm64 pointer tagging, VA-bits, the end of the wor... Peter Robinson
