On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:11:39PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Wookey wrote: > > +++ Steven Chamberlain [2016-04-01 10:31 +0100]: > > > Currently haskell-http2 FTBFS on only armel: > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-http2&suite=unstable > > > delaying the package's testing migration and keeping many reverse-deps > > > BD-Uninstallable on armel. > > > > > > More recently than that it has successfully built: > > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rbuild/unstable/armhf/haskell-http2_1.5.3-2.rbuild.log > > > > > > Therefore, please could it be given back for another build attempt? > > > > > > gb haskell-http2_1.5.3-2 . armel > > > > Seems a reasonable request. > > done > Thanks; it didn't work though. Please could arm porters take a look? > The reproducible-builds log shows the test suite passing, whereas on the > buildds one test failed, on both build attempts.
The reproducible-builds is armhf while the failing ones are armel. The regression appears to be a code change in haskell-http2 between 1.0.4 and 1.3.1: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-http2&arch=armel Riku
