On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:00:35PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I would rather drop any package which does use c++11 features without any > > reflection. > > I now understand the problem. Thanks. > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > No, just because some random c++11 thing doesn't work on armel doesn't > > mean we drop the arch. > > > > What it means is packages get to work without it until it's fixed. > > Yes, I see. (I was wrong.) > > https://bugs.debian.org/727621 > There seems to be some issue related to ATOMIC_type_LOCK_FREE. (I have > no clue but it is related to type.) > > I also see FEDORA applied attached arm patch changing float to double > and doing the alignment computing for mapped file. > > Is this patch something which work around the issue on armel? > > Also, as I see the upstream git repo, just after his release of this > tar, he is commiting > 5c274357ceaaff941b91e12d3f2f4714df0ecd16 > to revert CMakeLists.txt of oldscheool branch as: > > -if(UNIX) > - add_definitions("-std=c++11") > -endif(UNIX) > > Then recent commit has > + if(NOT BOOST_USE_CXX11) > + add_definitions("-DBOOST_NO_CXX11_SCOPED_ENUMS") > + endif() > > Are these kind of updates needed? > > Guo Yixuan, > > Can you talk to the upstream on this issue and what oldschool devel > branches mean? This branch is intended for the compilers without full support of c++11. [1] (Although currently it doesn't build. Perhaps we can switch to it when it's working.) [1] https://code.google.com/p/rimeime/issues/detail?id=632#c1 Yixuan
