On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 22:42 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 08:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 01:21 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > The Debian armhf architecture uses the ARM EABI hard-float variant, > > > whereas armel uses the soft-float variant. Although the kernel > > > doesn't use FP itself, CONFIG_VFP must be enabled to support > > > hard-float userland and will probably be disabled when supporting a > > > soft-float userland. So set the architecture to armhf by default when > > > CONFIG_AEABI and CONFIG_VFP are both enabled. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> > > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <i...@hellion.org.uk> > > > > We should also add the following. If there is some reason to do a v3 > > feel free to squash it into you patch (if you wish). > [...] > > arm64 is already in -next.
Great, then please ignore my patch! Cheers, Ian. > Actually, that means my patch is fuzzy as > it's based on v3.15. I hope that's OK. > > Ben. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1402468419.31087.42.ca...@dagon.hellion.org.uk
