Am 27.12.2013 03:16, schrieb Steve McIntyre: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> >> On a related note, DSA have concerns with the current arm* and mips* >> hardware. While there have been promises of new hardware to replace >> some of the current buggy machines, the offers are currently not >> leading to concrete results. Porters of these architectures should >> contact DSA and figure out a solution to avoid a situation where an >> architecture is in jeopardy due to insufficient buildd or porter >> machines. > > Ummm, WTH? We've been looking into possible *upgrades* to replace some > of the armel and armhf buildds with faster and (ideally) more easily > managed machines, but I *seriously* disagree with any suggestion that > the current machines are "buggy". I can see that with the some of the > known-buggy mips* machines, but I don't accept that the arm* machines > could/should be classified this way.
openjdk-6 fails to build on armel, because the testsuite hangs / times out. Not just once, but this seems to be a common failure. Builds fine on ipa.debian.net. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f7b980.9010...@debian.org
