+++ Johannes Schauer [2013-11-28 09:00 +0100]: > Quoting Steven Chamberlain (2013-11-28 01:04:56) > > On 27/11/13 17:58, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> $ curl -s http://mister-muffin.de/p/Gid8.txt | awk '{ if ($2=="11657") print > $0 }' | wc -l > 383 > > In this particular graph the maximum value of the second column (11657) is > less > than the total amount of source packages (in contrast to the first graph) > because this latter graph assumes that arch:all, essential:yes and > build-essential do not have to be rebuild. Therefore, lots of source packages > do not have to be compiled at all. > > > > Does anybody see enough value in these numbers for source package > > > importance in the light of bootstrapping Debian (either for a new port or > > > for rebuilding the archive from scratch)? > > > > I find the list of 383 packages interesting, at least. I think this > > closure is what I had in mind[0] for regular testing of ports' toolchains > > and > > reproducibility of builds. Yes. this is good stuff. Thanks for doing that josch. This list is very useful for arm64 bootstrapping right now. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131129121416.gh15...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
