Hi all,
On 11/14/2013 03:36 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
(resending for the 3rd time to the list, for some reason my emails only
appear on the list only if I sign them)
On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:21:00 +0000
peter green <plugw...@p10link.net> wrote:
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
So, my counter-proposal to that is that we get instead some cheap
easy to replace boards like the Arndale [4] or the Odroid-XU [5].
The main concern I would have is that these boards are "unproven".
Personally I'd want to see a new board successfully building packages
with a tolerable ammount (ideally zero) of crashes for at least a
month or so before comitting to build out an entire cluster of them.
That's true, but judging by the Odroid-X which I already have and has
been rock solid in compiling since day 1 (over USB for that matter), I'd
bet in favour of the odroid-XU as well. But yes, I wouldn't object
against testing first of course. My biggest concern is in actually
making a choice, and going with that, rather than insisting on a
particular solution.
Can we offer some Nitrogen6X boards for this? They have a convenient
SATA interface that provides pretty good speed (~110 MiB/s reads).
http://boundarydevices.com/products/nitrogen6x-board-imx6-arm-cortex-a9-sbc/
We'd certainly like the opportunity to contribute.
Please advise,
Eric Nelson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5285551e.8070...@boundarydevices.com
