On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > If there's a problem with the buildd's for armel, can we clarify what > the specific problem is and try to get more hardware resources thrown at > it? debian does have some funds, and this is a classic example of what > we should be using them for.
FWIW, the Calxeda boxes are armhf and armel capable and make a massive difference in buildd performance (good SATA I/O, 4G of RAM, SMP); these aren't exactly cheap (yet?), but I definitely wish Debian armel and armhf builds all eventually move to server class hardware like this. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130822111127.ge2...@bee.dooz.org
