Phil Endecott wrote (ao):
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> >eSATA didn't work for me reliably, but sata code is still said to be
> >work in progress
>
> Uh-oh, that doesn't sound good. Presence of SATA is important and
> needs to work well. Is there something specific about eSATA, rather
> than regular "internal" SATA?
I'm pretty sure it is SATA, not eSATA. I see some exynos5 specific
patches pass by on the lkml, not all support is in mainline yet afaik.
Sander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121204141703.GA23767@panda
