On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 20:15 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Aug 12, 2012, at 6:04 PM, shawn wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 17:52 -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>
> >> *) Presumably making the mtd partition starting at zero visible to
> >> Linux will alter the names of the other mtd partitions. Is this
> >> going
> >> to cause any problems down the line? like, with the programs that
> >> write the kernel and initrd to flash during an upgrade? will they
> >> have
> >> names like "mtd0" hard coded? or do they somehow find their targets
> >> adaptively?
> >
> > it does not change the given names, only the numbered names
>
> I apologize for my density, but what do you mean by "numbered names"
> and "given names"?
>
> I can't find anything in /dev/ other than /dev/mtd[012]{,ro} and /dev/
> mtdblock[012] which, to my inexperienced eye, look like "numbered
> names". There's nothing in /dev that looks like *uImage*, for
> example...
cat /proc/mtd
>
> Thanks!
>
> Rick
>
>
>
--
-Shawn Landden
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1344842240.9977.40.camel@shawn-ssd
