On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Hideki Yamane <henr...@debian.or.jp> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 18:35:44 +0100 > Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> wrote: >> buildds >> ======= >> >> Both armel and armhf are doing well, covering ~96% of the archive. We >> don't have any ARM server hardware yet, so we're stuck using >> development boards as build machines. They work, but they're a PITA >> for hosting and they're not designed for 24x7 usage like we're doing >> so they're not that reliable. > > As I've posted during DebConf(*), Maybe OpenBlocks can solve this problem. > It has 2GB RAM, reliable production use and we can buy it NOW. > > *) http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2012/07/msg00007.html
hideki, those look superb. summarising (in case anyone's missed it): they're armv7 compatible because they're using a marvell xp processor; they're up to dual-core 1.4ghz and the company openblocks can do them with up to 3gb of RAM, and i gather the openblocks boxes have a mini pci-e port as well as gigabit ethernet. i'm including arm-netbooks because there may almost certainly be people on that list who would be interested in a group buy. there has been quite a bit of interest in getting hold of modular computing devices for rack-mounted server usage. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPweEDxB=akchpidonavwvuon9xf0gge9cf2smyjrrgdm3+...@mail.gmail.com
