On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 11:36:08AM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >On Aug 8, 2011, at 16:34, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >> >> I think we need a good comparison / feature / selection page -- choose the >> requirements, then see the result: >> >> USB 2.0 ports ports yes / no how many [ ] >> USB 3.0 ports ports yes / no how many [ ] >> Fast Ethernet ports yes / no how many [ ] >> Gigabit Ethports yes / no how many [ ] >> SATA I >> SATA II >> SATA III >> eSATA >> >> and so on ..... >> >> At least this will help research on what board is best for specific >> requirements.\
Definitely. We started a similar page at http://wiki.debian.org/ArmHardFloatBuildd to help us track what to use for Debian. Please feel free to extend / improve on the information there! >Makes sense to me, would be quite useful for a number of projects >since the Fedora and Mandriva folks are also looking at creating or >updating their ARM ports. The Mageia folks are targetting v5t (and softfp ABI) rather than v7 at this point - see discussion on the cross-distro list. Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcint...@linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110809095527.ga3...@linaro.org
