Hello Daniel, 2011/7/21 PALFFY Daniel <dpal...@rainstorm.org>: [...] > Other than that, the usual manual install > (kernel, lvm2, initramfs-tools, u-boot-tools manually, manual mkimage) > everything worked fine.
Great! :-) > - Debian kernel: 3.0 won't support the mx51 in the same image as the > mx50/mx53, they have the base of RAM at 0x90000000 vs 0x70000000. > > If I can help to make mx53loco an officially supported platform, please tell > me what I can help. In order to get mx53loco officially supported, we need to address the issue you comment about base of RAM. As it was picked 'mx5' sub-architecture, in order to get mx50/mx51/mx53 into one image. Getting proper *mainline linux kernel* support is required and addressing RAM base address is an important topic. It looks like the magic to accomplish that is related to a couple symbols: ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and RUNTIME_PHYS_OFFSET, which since 2.6.39 or above have experimental of support, not sure about exact details. Best regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. <free spam> -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference? ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments.xhtml ** </free spam> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caodfwefapysx+lm_gohdbwd4qxmml9i8u+xmr4+annoqqao...@mail.gmail.com
