On 02.03.2011 07:36, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > On 2 March 2011 03:34, Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> wrote: > >> I'll make gcc-4.5 the default for (at least some) architectures within the >> next >> two weeks before more transitions start. GCC-4.5 is already used as the >> default >> compiler for almost any other distribution, so there shouldn't be many >> surprises >> on at least the common architectures. About 50% of the build failures >> exposed >> by GCC-4.5 are fixed [1]. I didn't see issues on amd64 and i386, armel >> (although optimized for a different processor) and powerpc (some object >> files >> linked into shared libs had to be built as pic). >> >> As the maintainer file for the ports in GCC is a bit outdated, I'd like to >> ask >> which architectures should do the switch together with the four >> architectures >> mentioned above, and which not, and which ones should be better delayed, or >> dropped. >> > Could you add armhf to the list?
keeping armhf to build from the linaro branch? Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d6e5293.8060...@debian.org
