On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis <mar...@genesi-usa.com> wrote: > On 21 November 2010 22:15, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> > wrote: > ... > >> p.s. just in _case_ this is going to be censored (again), it's being >> made public elsewhere. i don't like having to repeat myself. > > Yes, please don't repeat that rant. It was, well let's put it mildly, off > topic.
apologies konstantinos, this crossed over with someone else's excellent question, to which you should be receiving the response by now. the summary is this: i do not believe it is off-topic to have specific hardware and specific software totally excluded from testing at the sprint, on the basis that the only available toolchain, libraries and firmware is proprietary, requires an NDA and is only given out to the ARM silicon licensees, let alone to end-users. that it is entirely ARM's fault that this situation is the case is particularly embarrassing - to ARM, who are actually sponsoring the sprint, but that fact _is_, strictly speaking, off-topic. l. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikdvwfn055eq7gnsso58vzf6zk=gblftcn5s...@mail.gmail.com
