Hello Loïc, 2010/7/15, Loïc Minier <l...@dooz.org>: > Concerning the triplet choice, I'd highly recommend reading this > upstream thread: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-07/threads.html#00179
Thanks for sharing it. Quite interesting. For my point of view, ABI should not be encoded in the upstream triplet names, as Paul comments, but, indeed when transition from OABI to EABI, they did create another triplet (indeed, another architecture: arm-none-linux-gnueabi). In that case, Debian was clear to take it as another architecture, but, nowadays, arm-none-linux-gnueabi supports hard, soft and softfp. Bringing old discussions up to front, would not make sense to have ABI support in the distribution itself (which really is an overhead) and not in the upstream code? Best regards, -- Héctor Orón "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim-xugodbysbugdta-zks_s9h9xwxxygaqe5...@mail.gmail.com
