On Thu, Jul 15, 2010, Matt Sealey wrote: > Let's say we said, the new port will be based on the Thumb ISA as in > the ARMv7-A and depdenent on that profile, could we call it "thumb" or > "thumbee" or so and remove the differentiation on arm and armel by the > fact that it's built for this new improved instruction set with > greater code density?
Ubuntu armel defaults to Thumb-2 since lucid, I think it would be a poor choice to name the port after the default ISA if both ARM and Thumb ISAs can co-exist in the port. Or are you proposing to create a thumb port, but using soft-float ABI? If this is still about hard-float ABI, then the port should have a name reflecting that. -- Loïc Minier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100715183750.gb6...@bee.dooz.org