Peter, 

Thanks for your reply. Write buffer coalescing is enabled in the 2.6.32 tree as 
Arnaud's patch is included. 


I also ran Peter Teichmann's test program -- all the numbers match up to your 
post. 


I am ready to chalk this up to bad hardware and give up on this completely. 
Having a NAS with 4x SATA 3G drives and two 1GB NICs bottlenecked at 5MB/second 
is a bad joke from Intel. 


-Danny 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Horton" <z...@colonel-panic.org> 
To: "danny rodriguez" <danny.rodrig...@comcast.net> 
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:41:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: SS4000-E (Lack of) Performance 

On 13/05/2010 00:55, danny.rodrig...@comcast.net wrote: 
> 
> Thanks to the work of many on this mailing list, I've been able to 
> install SID (w/ kernel 2.6.32-5) on my SS4000-E NAS. 
> 
> Much to my surprise, the performance of the unit is pretty much 
> identical to how it was running the proprietary Falconstor implementation. 
> 
> 
> hdparm -tT /dev/sda reads : 
> /dev/sda: 
> Timing cached reads: 128 MB in 2.00 seconds = 63.93 MB/sec 
> Timing buffered disk reads: 114 MB in 3.04 seconds = 37.44 MB/sec 
> 
> The results from hdparm are static across all 4 drives. 
> 
> 
> Needless to say -- these numbers are atrocious. Max throughput by any 
> means (NFS, FTP, etc.) is about 5MB/sec on writes to the NAS, and 
> 8-9MB/sec on reads from it. 
> 
> 
> I did come across an earlier post from "Andrushka" that stated 2.6.32 
> has DMA enabled for "this platform". >From everything I have read, there 
> is no DMA to enable/disable for SATA, but my knowledge is extremely 
> limited in this arena. He does claim that an alternative linux distro 
> installed on the box got 12MB/sec out of the unit. 
> 
> (post is here: 
> http://us.generation-nt.com/ss4000e-iop-dma-help-170355901.html ) 
> 
> 
> I'm wondering if anyone has figured out why the performance of this unit 
> is so overwhelmingly bad, or if anyone has suggestions on how to go 
> about diagnosing the cause? 
> 

Not sure it's related but there's a thread about memory performance on 
the 80129 here http://marc.info/?t=120446234500001&r=1&w=2. I gave up on 
my N2100 NAS 'cos it was soooo slow. 

P. 

Reply via email to