On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > There is a major problem with gcc 4.4 and armel - the ABI of va_list > changed (for c++ libraries). We need to decide one of the following:
What exactly have changed? The ABI (as said in the sentence before) or the mangling. > 1) library package name rename (like c2a rename previously) > - Some hassle for !armel sid users while transition happens No, this would be a armel-only change. > 2) binNMU campaign > - during the upgrade armel sid users packages will be broken (some > already are) > - even after, partial upgrades for armel users risk broken setups There is no core package affected, so well. > 3) g++ downgrade or reverting to the old va_list mangling within g++4.4 > for armel Haha. 4) If it is only the mangling, add a compatibility symbol to libstdc++. Bastian -- Men will always be men -- no matter where they are. -- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org