Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Thomas Boehne <tboe...@adwin.de> [2009-05-12 10:21]: > They don't contain the old DMA patches but some other performance > patches from Marvell.
At least hdparm shows significantly better performance compared to 2.6.26-dma: With 2.6.30: qnap:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 198 MB in 2.01 seconds = 98.33 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 128 MB in 3.02 seconds = 42.35 MB/sec With 2.6.26-dma, the numbers were about 80 and 30 MB/sec. Unfortunately, I have no gigabit hardware at home to test network performance, maybe I can do some more tests in the office. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
