On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 05:19:52PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:06:56PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > > Good stuff. Which instruction set are you building for? v4t?
> The Debian armel gcc patch that I produced switches the default from > v5 back to to v4t. I assume he's using that, so yes, that would be > v4t (with interworking.) Correct. OTOH I havent tested it on a armv4t machine, but if is really important, I expect someone to complain eventually that it doesn't work ;) -- "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
