Previously Philip Blundell wrote: > It's not a dead link: it's telling the truth. xfonts-bolkhov doesn't appear > in the quinn-diff output (probably because it isn't built for *any* > architectures) and the autobuilder has never heard of it.
So why is it in a `hall of shame' then? It sounds like the maintainer isn't doing anything wrong here. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
