On Wed 29 Aug, Philip Blundell wrote: > >At least on sa1100-type machines (mostly the lart) I've found 2.4.6-rmk1-np2 > >to be a good kernel vintage. After that things started to break again and > >boot loaders need to be changed...
> Okay. Well, that reminds me: aside from riscpc, netwinder and shark, are > there any other subarchitectures for which it makes sense to ship kernel > packages? I don't know whether any of the SA1100-type machines fall into > that category or not. The only plausible one is the lart, which, if you attach an HD, can have standard debian installed. Making boot-floppies work on it is on my list of things to do, (but quite a long way down :-( ). For most of the others (ipaq, tuxscreen, cerfboard etc) you are limited to 16/32 or maybe a CF card levels of storage and standard debian isn't really appropriate. PDA- or embedded- debian is what's needed. Of course the kernel packages may be exactly the same so they could be useful to developers and especially to the emdebian project but I'm not sure there's much point filling the Debian archive itself with them? So I think there's good arguments for making lkab supply some kernels for more devices, but for Debian itself adding lart (and Riscstation if the patches are now avaialble?) is sufficient. (the netwinder kernels covers CATS too right?) Wookey -- Aleph One Ltd, Bottisham, CAMBRIDGE, CB5 9BA, UK Tel (00 44) 1223 811679 work: http://www.aleph1.co.uk/ play: http://www.chaos.org.uk/~wookey/
