On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:23:54AM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Yes I am aware of it. I haven't had a chance to review it yet, though, > and I thought that having the rest of the package already in > experimental would be a good idea. What makes me a bit cautios about > ITK is that it adds new APIs and these would also be in the executable > even if a user does not use ITK.
You mean the extra hook? There are already weird extra hooks in upstream for modules much more obscure than mpm-itk, so hopefully that will work out okay :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120322112630.gb19...@uio.no
