Jaime Ochoa Malagón <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> "Hans-J. Ullrich" <[email protected]> writes: >> >> >> So I guess the question is how to we organise to get it back into the >> >> repro's - the debian way ? >> > >> > I think, if people wish for it, then ftp-master should be asked to put it >> > back >> > again. However, I underrstand, it might cause trouble (as other packages >> > might >> > cause, too!), but this is the kind of "experimental"! or "unstable", just >> > as >> > its name is expressing. >> >> Actuaky the Debian CTTE would be better as I asked them to review the >> matter. I probably wouldn't hurt to let them know you miss >> ia32-apt-get. :) > > we miss ia32-apt-get
The Debian CTTE reads on [email protected]. :) >> > I understand well, there are efforts to chose other ways, so ia32-apt-get >> > should not block the other ways. Well, which one will win at last will show >> > the future. IMO ia32-apt-get is a good way at the moment, and I think, even >> > Goswin would not mourne if some day a better way will be found and >> > ia32-apt- >> > get will disappear. The future will show us. >> >> ia32-apt-get will disapear and was always ment to disapear with >> multiarch. I also always intended to make that transition as smooth as >> possible. The multiarch people fear that ia32-apt-get might conflict >> with multiarch, and currently they are right. The existing packages >> would conflicht with future multiarch packages. But to resolve that >> some of the multiarch features have to be added to dpkg first and then >> ia32-apt-get can be updated to use those features for a smooth >> upgrade. So from my side there is a solid plan in place how to do a >> smooth upgrade to multiarch. No blocks in sight. > > there are good news :-) If ftp-master lets me. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
