I guess I could have made myself a little more clear. I understand the 64 bit OO2 progress, thanks.
I noticed that OO2 is not offered in any linux binary except those wrapped in rpm's I was thinking that OO2 would come with the same installer as 1.2 did....I think it was a _bin_ ? Anyways, I tried converting the OO2 rpm's to debs, but ran into a few problems and was hoping there was a simpler way. By-the-way, I still don't understand why one would need to set up a 32 bit chroot just to run OO when we have 32 bit emulation? Thanks for the ideas and opinions, Chris w. On Friday 09 December 2005 20:10, Graham Smith wrote: > :o) > > This one comes up every few days. > > Basically it goes like this... > > OOo 2.0 isn't likely to ever find it's way into the AMD64 repository at > least not as a 64 bit app. It's not 64 bit clean and, if you do get it > compiled, won't run correctly. > > Your best bet is to install it in a 32 bit chroot. It's not a terribly nice > solution IMHO but it does work pretty well. > > Graham > > On Friday 09 December 2005 10:42, Chris Wakefield wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > I'm looking to install OpenOffice 2.0, anyone using it? > > > > Thanks for any replies, > > Chris W. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
