Patrick ZAJDA, le jeu. 20 mars 2025 15:24:19 +0100, a ecrit: > What could be done to have this fix backported to the version of QT5 and why > not 6 which are provided in Bookworm?
You can work on the backport :) That means identifying the upstream commit that fixes the issue, try to build a patched debian package with it and confirm that this fixes the issue, and then you can send the patch to the bug tracker. Once it gets integrated into testing, we can ask for a stable update. > Debian testing has a right QT6 version as fare as I know. But Bookworm not. > The QT team provide patches to be ported for Linux distributions I.E. Debian > and other but it looks it is not considered enough importent to be fixed in > Debian as it seems, unfortunately. Determining exactly which patch actually fixes the issue, is an involved task. I'm really not surprised that the Debian maintainer hasn't taken the time to do it, because the reproduction scenario is quite involved. If you provide the patch file to the bug tracker saying "I have verified that this upstream commit, when applied on the debian package, fixes it for me", that'll be *way* easier for the Debian maintainer to accept it. Samuel
