Package: libvte-2.91-0
Version: 0.60.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #941013
Dear Maintainer,
The upstream maintainers will likely not apply the patch for bad reasons
and beause they dont care with accessibility. Could Debian do it,
to ensure the MATE terminal app to be accessible (it is the default when
installing accessibility), and to value the Debian accessibility work
in general? If we accept to do what upstream refuses, it would be the mark
of our involvement in accessibility in this distro. The patch is already
done. At least, I would like to have it in experimental or sid to test
if users complain of side-effects.
Thanks
Regards
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.4.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libvte-2.91-0 depends on:
ii libatk1.0-0 2.36.0-2
ii libc6 2.30-4
ii libcairo2 1.16.0-4
ii libfribidi0 1.0.8-2
ii libglib2.0-0 2.64.2-1
ii libgnutls30 3.6.13-2
ii libgtk-3-0 3.24.18-1
ii libicu63 63.2-3
hi libpango-1.0-0 1.42.4-8
hi libpangocairo-1.0-0 1.42.4-8
ii libpcre2-8-0 10.34-7
ii libstdc++6 10-20200411-1
ii libsystemd0 245.4-4
ii libvte-2.91-common 0.60.1-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2
libvte-2.91-0 recommends no packages.
libvte-2.91-0 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
