Paul Wise, le mar. 17 avril 2018 11:20:15 +0800, a ecrit: > On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 10:15 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Well, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855446 > > accessible-via seems different to what I propose. > > accessible-via references software that makes each package accessible.
Not exactly software, but the kind of support that software provides: braille, speech, and which software because that makes a technical difference in the quality of the information provided. > The proposed accessible-to would reference classes of abilities that > are required to use the package. For example accessible-to::sighted. > I've no idea if this sort of thing would be useful though. The problem is that "abilities" is a terrible beast to define. "sighted" for instance does not mean anything, since there is an extremely wide range of sightedness, which can't for instance actually be reduced a single "quality" scalar value as opticians define. "being able to read written braille", "being able to hear speech synthesis", "being able to read a zoomed display", however, does mean something to users, thus the accessible-via tags. > > but it seems https://debtags.debian.org/ hasn't gotten updated yet. > > I'd suggest filing another bug about that. Eww. Samuel
