Hello, Bruno Mascret, on mar. 24 oct. 2017 16:09:51 +0200, wrote: > Jeuclid licence is totally clear: ASL 2.0 ([1]http://jeuclid.sourceforge.net/ > license.html).
What is written on a website now is not necessarily what actually applies to the tarball which was downloaded years ago. The only thing that one can trust as being authoritative answer is the tarball itself, and see http://bugs.debian.org/876733 : there it is contradiction between what is written in NOTICE and what is written in LICENSE.txt > How can we avoid the removal? By discussing about it on 876...@bugs.debian.org Samuel
