Samuel Thibault, on sam. 18 févr. 2017 11:50:11 +0100, wrote: > to describe whether the package is technically accessible: > - accessibility::accessible-with::at-spi
I'm thinking that this should perhaps rather be accessibility::accessible-via::at-spi so as to mark that this is really different from > - accessibility::accessible-with::orca-braille > - accessibility::accessible-with::orca-speech > - accessibility::accessible-with::brltty-braille > - accessibility::accessible-with::brltty-speech > - accessibility::accessible-with::speakup-speech > - accessibility::accessible-with::yasr-speech since in the first case it's just a technical thing which does not assert any actual usability (which could be set by scripts when it for instance uses a gtk ui), while the second really means somebody tested it. Samuel
